Big Feet Means a Big… You Know

Big in the pants and big in the shoes. Almost everyone in western civilization has heard this adage at some point or another. Studies, including one by the London Urology Clinic, however, have not discovered a connection between a person's member size and the size of their feet.

However, the two doctors who did the study went on to receive the 1998 Ig Nobel Prize. In 1993, a Canadian study of 63 men assessed their height, foot size, and penile length and discovered only a flimsy correlation between these factors and the length of one's manhood. The two doctors continued by claiming that their study's findings had no "practical utility."

A 1999 study in Korea measured the flaccid members of 655 men and compared those measurements to their foot sizes and the rest of their body parts (even going as far as measuring the length of each participant's car). It found no correlation between any of those things, with the possible exception of the girth and circumference of a given man's manhood, but even that wasn't conclusive. In actuality, this myth has been disproved in every significant study that has addressed it since 1999.