Humans are Better Soldiers than Robots
The employment of AI in warfare is now one of the most contentious applications of the technology. Should we allow machines to decide between life and death in a conflict area? Is it moral to allow a robot to murder a person? The majority of people appear to be opposed to the idea, and the US has previously reassured us that humans will always have the final say. Despite this, there is conjecture that autonomous killing machines have already been deployed in battle. So, are robots more effective soldiers than people? Depending on your definition of better, yes.
Even an artificially intelligent computer will complete the task at hand. The employment of AI in warfare is now one of the most contentious applications of the technology. Should we trust machines to decide who lives and who dies? When Stanislav Petrov learned that the American military had started a nuclear attack on the Soviet Union in 1983, an AI would probably have acted differently than it did since it lacks human empathy and ethics. As necessary, Petrov did not inform his authorities of the attack that his monitoring station had discovered; instead, he looked into it further and found that it was a false alarm.
If AI had taken the opposite action, none of us would be present to discuss it now. They lack morality and have a tendency to handle facts in an erratic manner. Everyone has issued warnings about the potential dangers of AI, from Elon Musk to Stephen Hawking. That is not at all what a good soldier does.
