Top 10 Future Weapons of Mass Destruction

03-11-2022 10 1 0 0 Báo lỗi

A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is any chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or other weapon capable of killing and injuring a large number of people or causing considerable damage to artificial structures, natural structures, or the biosphere. Obviously, these weapons grow in size and destructiveness. People might expect those weapons to become even more lethal in the future. Follow the list of top 10 Future Weapons of Mass Destruction that you should not miss.

1 Đỗ Thị Nga

Brain Drones

Drones are becoming very popular in warfare and have proven to be quite lethal. A drone flying from the other side of the planet and capable of dropping bombs on any target is something of a nightmare. The only thing that could make it worse is if the person in charge on the other side of the world wasn't present. And it looks like DARPA has been working on this for a while.

The drone operates autonomously and is controlled by a neural chip that is essentially an artificial intelligence robot. Currently, they are all in their infancy and elementary stages, and they are not yet complete with Matrix Sentinels. However, the foundation is already established and the technology will continue to improve. Neural circuits are expected to allow these drones to recognize their surroundings and behave accordingly.

One particularly obnoxious sentence from a 2014 paper indicates that there is hope that the chip will allow drones to experience different levels of safety or to different preferences. While safety and a sense of home is desirable, it also implies that a drone may experience the opposite at some point and may react as a result. defensively. So while no one is promising that the future of war will be emotional drones that know where they are and can react with horror in confrontation, it seems to be the case. the path they are on.
2 Đỗ Thị Nga

Psychotronic Weapons

What else is there if you have weapons that can destroy buildings, affect the weather, destroy a country's infrastructure, and scramble electronics? The only thing you're missing at this moment is a weapon capable of destroying your opponent from within. This is when psychoactive weapons come into play. These are weapons designed to influence the minds of soldiers in opposing combatants. Anything designed to influence another person's consciousness and brain. When laid out like this, it sounds really absurd. What sort of weapon has the ability to control another person's mind? Or do you want them to see things that aren't there?

In 2018, study into inexplicable injuries reported by American diplomats in Cuba indicated that the diplomats may have been subjected to psychotronic weaponry. It was suspected that a microwave device was utilized, resulting in brain damage. When you are the victim of one of these episodes, you may hear noises that appear to be natural but are actually coming from within your own skull. Even the deaf can detect when they are being targeted with a microwave device. It is possible to beam sounds and words directly into someone's skull. The consequences can be unpleasant and devastating, possibly making a victim comatose.
3 Đỗ Thị Nga

Isomer Bombs

To understand what an isomer bomb is, you must first understand how nuclear power works. Isomers are atomic nuclei that have the same mass and atomic number but differ in their radioactivity. You could swiftly modify the state of these nuclear isomers if you designed an isomer bomb. They call it triggering because these nuclei ordinarily decay extremely slowly, but if you trigger them and it works, you will be able to receive a big burst of gamma and x-ray radiation. So it'd be stable enough until you needed it to explode up on demand. The energy burst that would result would be enormous.

At the moment, an isomer bomb, commonly associated with the nuclear isomer of hafnium, is thought to be at least 100,000 times more energetic than a chemical reaction. One gram of hafnium has the same energy as 660 pounds of TNT. Because the energy produced involves a shift of energy between nucleons, it is a distinct type of nuclear energy than fission or fusion. It's also purely theoretical right now.

The hafnium issue happened in the 1990s, and a group of researchers claimed to have actually been able to induce an isomer reaction. However, no other scientists were able to replicate the results, and many scientists believe it is impossible. Nonetheless, Russia appears to have continued research into the concept of an isomer bomb.
4 Đỗ Thị Nga

Cyber Weapons

Cyber Weapons rank 4th in list of Future Weapons of Mass Destruction. Mass destruction does not have to take the form of explosions, rubble, and large craters in the Earth in the modern world. If you truly want to cripple an opponent, all you have to do is destroy their infrastructure. While devastating physical warfare with bombs and guns is unlikely to go out of style, cyber warfare can wreak greater damage in less time.

In theory, conducting a cyberattack can destroy an enemy from within if you have the capability. Communications networks, military systems, and even a country's electrical grid and financial backbone can all be disabled or deleted. There is almost nothing in the modern world that is not run by a computer and administered by a computer network. With a team of trained cyber assault specialists on the other side of the planet, it is possible to control an enemy's military arsenals, cripple their economy, and literally leave them in the dark.
5 Đỗ Thị Nga

Geophysical Weapons

Geophysical weapons are a common term used in a number of foreign countries to describe a combination of various means that allow the destructive forces of inanimate nature to be used for military purposes through artificially induced changes in the physical properties and processes that occur in the Earth's atmosphere, hydrosphere, and lithosphere. The huge energy content of many natural processes accounts for their destructive potential. As an example, the energy released by a single hurricane is equivalent to the energy released by thousands of nuclear bombs.

In the form of seismic weapons, these are the kind of weapons that can alter the climate and environment, as well as the Earth itself. It has long been assumed that the United States military operates a station in Alaska known as HAARP, which stands for High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. According to conspiracy theories, this facility is researching high frequency radio waves and how they can impact the ionosphere when deployed as a geophysical weapon. Beyond Alaska, China has made advances in technologies that many believe may be used as geophysical weapons. They only recently reported success in managing the local weather. So while it may sound a lot like fiction, it seems like China has at least had some success moving forward with these plans.
6 Đỗ Thị Nga

Hypersonic Kinetic Energy

Rods from God was the name given to this weapon by the media in 2004. And nothing was heard for a long time regarding the hypersonic kinetic energy weapons system. However, it is still in development and has the potential to be as devastating as nuclear weapons. The Outer Space Treaty was signed by 107 countries in 1967. This pact prohibited the use of weapons of mass devastation from space. However, at the time, weapons of mass destruction were classified as nuclear, biological, and chemical. And a hypersonic kinetic energy weapon is neither of these. In reality, these weapons are little more than tungsten rods.

Twenty feet long and one foot wide. If these were launched from, by the time they impacted the ground, they would have the power of an intercontinental ballistic missile, wiping out anything below. Project Thor was motivated by the usage of Lazy Dog bombs during the Vietnam War. These were two-inch-long pieces of steel that were dropped from planes. They would hit the earth at around 500 miles per hour as they gained velocity. There was no need for explosives, and they could penetrate concrete nearly a foot deep.

Project Thor, also known as Rods from God, entails dropping tungsten rods the size of telephone poles from space satellites. They can travel at ten times the speed of sound before collapsing. And when they reached the ground, they'd sink several hundred feet through it. That means that even if a target is hidden in a bunker, they are not secure. When the rods collide, enough force is released to rival a ground-penetrating nuclear weapon. Furthermore, there is no fallout from the explosion.
7 Đỗ Thị Nga

Directed Energy

Directed Energy ranks 7th in the list of Future Weapons of Mass Destruction. PHASER is not the only direct energy weapon in the military's arsenal today. This broad phrase include weapons such as electro-magnetics, lasers, and microwaves. Between 2017 and 2019, the US military increased its investment on direct energy weapons research. That figure has risen to $1.1 billion. Of course, China and Russia are also heavily investing in these systems.

The advantages of deploying direct energy weapons versus conventional munitions are quite obvious. To begin with, they operate at the speed of light. In contrast to a regular missile, which may take some time to travel from source to target, a direct energy blast will reach a target practically instantly. They may also be targeted much more precisely. If you choose, you can use a laser to blast someone in the foot from space. The weapons are also scalable, allowing them to take on a single tiny target or a much greater region as needed.

In May 2020, the US Navy published video of the USS Portland killing a drone with a high-energy class solid state laser. The military is also working on the Indirect Fire Protection Capability High Energy Laser, which is reported to be ten times more powerful than the one used by the Navy. This laser would be capable of destroying incoming cruise missiles, crippling boats and helicopters, and blinding opposing fighters.

Because these weapons are fuelled by electricity, they are significantly more cost-effective in the long term than utilizing billion-dollar bombs. A laser costs around $10 in energy to fire. You always have ammunition as long as you have electricity. However, if you are using lasers to attack, the adversary will never have to wait for you to reload or run out of ammunition.
8 Đỗ Thị Nga

High-Powered Microwave

The term phaser became commonplace thanks to Star Trek. When you hear the word, you know exactly what it means, even if you've never seen anything like it before, because what exactly is a phaser? PHASER is now an actual thing, and the US military has it. It's the name they gave to a high-powered microwave weapon. The PHASER, which resembles a satellite dish mounted on a shipping container, is a cannon that emits radio frequency in a cone-shaped beam. Rather than using heat to destroy a target, a burst of energy can be used to damage circuits.

This technology is currently being employed defensively; the objective is to use the PHASER to destroy opposing drones. It only takes one microsecond for a PHASER shot to disable and destroy a drone's circuitry. Because of the pattern of the beam it produces, it can also take down many drones with a single blast. The PHASER is the first direct energy defensive weapon ever deployed. The Air Force spent little more than 16 million dollars developing it, and testing was expected to be completed by the end of 2020. If the technique can be proven in the field and is scalable, mobile PHASERS could be employed on a regular basis in the future. Aircraft may fly over a population and effectively destroy every item of technology below with a few bursts, effectively returning any city to the Stone Age.
9 Đỗ Thị Nga

Genetic Weapons

Genetic Weapons ranks 9th in the list of Future Weapons of Mass Destruction. When you take biological weapons to the next, horrifying level, you get genetic weapons. These are genetically targeted weapons, which means that you might take a typical biological weapon (anthrax, for example) and customize it to exclusively infect persons with specific genetic features. That is, if you simply wanted to eradicate one ethnic group, you could do so.

In the past, the concept of genetic weapons was dismissed as unfeasible or unrealistic. Genetic advances have shown that this is wrong. According to the paper Biotechnology, Weapons, and Humanity II, their research into vaccine creation and attempts to heal genetic disorders has allowed scientists to correctly map the human genome in a way that exposes unique genes that are specific to different ethnic groups. Rogue scientists can then utilize this information to target certain genes rather than use them to help humanity and cure ailments. It is believed that with this information, ethnic-specific biological weapons could be constructed in the future.

Other genetic weapons do not have to rely on existing diseases; they can disrupt human RNA. A genetic weapon might shut down essential genes required for your survival and function by using a technique known as RNA interference. This could be used against an enemy population while having no effect on the attacking population. It would not be able to entirely remove one side, but statistics suggests that up to 20% of a population might be affected immediately. And that is more than enough to inflict serious harm.
10 Đỗ Thị Nga

Antimatter Weapons

The term antimatter conjures up images from Star Trek science fiction. It hardly sounds like it could be real. Unfortunately, it is a real possibility, and the potential for antimatter to wreak significant damage is ripe for the taking. For a long time, antimatter was thought to be theoretical until evidence of its existence was discovered. When cosmic rays collide with the Earth's atmosphere, they generate antimatter. Thunderstorms appear to produce positrons on occasion. The Large Hadron Collider can also generate matter and antimatter.

Antimatter is any material made up of what are known as antiparticles. According to the theory of antimatter, every particle in the cosmos is a mirror version of itself. It's the same item with a different charge. The most common example is that an electron has a negative charge while a positron has a positive charge. They both have the same mass, but they are diametrically opposed. When matter and antimatter collide, the effect is not only destructive, but perplexingly terrible. According to particle physicist Frank Close, destroying a kilogram of antimatter creates approximately 10 billion times the amount of energy as destroying a kilogram of dynamite. This is 1,000 times more energy than nuclear fission. So, if you could capture enough antimatter, you could probably destroy the entire world with no effort.

objective Completely accurate

Is the top 3 criteria that always aims to bring the most useful information to the community

Toplist Joint Stock Company
Address: 3rd floor, Viet Tower Building, No. 01 Thai Ha Street, Trung Liet Ward, Dong Da District, Hanoi City, Vietnam
Phone: O369132468 - Tax code: 0108747679
Social network license number 370/GP-BTTTT issued by the Ministry of Information and Communications on September 9, 2019
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use